![]() |
|
| How do they estimate the total population
from the number of recaptured animals?
First, they assume that the marked individuals had time to
move randomly through the habitat upon release. After
recapture, they then calculate the ratio of the number of
recaptured animals that had marks to the number of animals that were originally
marked. Comparing this to
the total number of recaptured animals lets the ecologists form
an educated guess as to the total number of individuals in the
population.
Do you think this would be an accurate approach to estimating population size? What is the point of recapturing? Can you think of some drawbacks of this method? |
A modern fruit-fly trap |
For populations of birds and mammals, the capture-recapture method has proven to be an effective tool for studying ecosystems in terms of size and diversity. However, how do we study invisible populations like those of bacteria? Gaining knowledge about these microscopic organisms requires more than just the ability to see them. Ecologists take samples of bacteria from various locations and then later attempt to grow them in a laboratory environment. But in the past, only a relatively small percentage of bacteria have been successfully grown or cultured.
![]() |
In response to this problem, scientists have recently developed a new approach that involves culturing the bacteria in an environment similar to where they were found. This brings up another question. If we have only just begun to culture a variety of bacteria, how do we know that one million species of bacteria exist if we have only described a little under 5,000 in any detail? We guess! |
Introduction |
Why It Matters |
How We Find Out |
What We Know |
Story Time
Common Hazards |
Activities |
Self-Study Game |
Teachers Pages |
Standards (TEKS)
Peer Curriculum |
Ecosystems Home Page |
Communication Exercises
Copyright © 2001-2003
Web Site Privacy Statement